Are you sure you want to exit? Your progress will be lost.
Who are you caring for?
Which best describes their mobility?
How well are they maintaining their hygiene?
How are they managing their medications?
Does their living environment pose any safety concerns?
Fall risks, spoiled food, or other threats to wellbeing
Are they experiencing any memory loss?
Which best describes your loved one's social life?
Acknowledgment of Disclosures and Authorization
By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington. Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services. APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid. We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour. APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment. You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints. Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or ConsumerFeedback@aplaceformom.com to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights. APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.I agree that: A.I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information"). B.APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink. C.APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site. D.If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records. E.This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year. F.You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
✔
I acknowledge and authorize
✔
I consent to the collection of my consumer health data.*
✔
I consent to the sharing of my consumer health data with qualified home care agencies.*
*If I am consenting on behalf of someone else, I have the proper authorization to do so. By clicking Get My Results, you agree to our Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
Mostly Independent
Your loved one may not require home care or assisted living services at this time. However, continue to monitor their condition for changes and consider occasional in-home care services for help as needed.
Remember, this assessment is not a substitute for professional advice.
Share a few details and we will match you to trusted home care in your area:
With all due respect to you, why is it your business who your neighbor leaves his property to? He may not have dementia and is still in control of his own life, finances, and decisions. So really, he has a right to leave his property to whomever he damn well pleases. People so often think that an old person's property must all be left to their adult kids if they have them or to other family if they don't. No, it doesn't. A fellow caregiver and friend that I knew when we were agency help took on a case. It was for a very wealthy and elderly gay man who lived alone. His partner who he was with for over 50 years passed away and he was alone. He had out-of-state relatives who never bothered with him. Some sent a Christmas card from time to time. He was in poor physical health but mentally he was fine. My friend took the case and ended up quitting the agency to be a live-in caregiver for the man. She moved in with her little daughter and it worked out well for a few years until he died. He left her his entire estate. Five million cash. The property and artwork at least twice that. He named each of his relatives by name leaving them one dollar apiece. Why shouldn't he have? My friend was the only person who was decent to him. His family couldn't be bothered.
I would say that this aide has signed something with the VA where she is not allowed to except large "gifts". Yes, I would report it. If he has family inform them. Its a conflict of interest IMO.
Legal is one thing. Iffy is another. If there is concerned and ENGAGED family for this elderly neighbor I am certain they will take this issue to the VA. If there IS no concerned family and this caregiver is someone the elderly neighbor has become very fond of, this may pass muster. My parents knew a caregiver who was given enough funds to buy herself a duplex so that she would be safe for life, their wish for her. The family could afford it and wished to do it. She was however, privately paid. If you are working for a hospital system there are often rules against accepting gifts. Again, this is something for the family involved to consider and pursue if they wish to.
My grandmother left her small house to her caregiver of eight years. She left everything else to her 7 children. Her children all owned houses. Rose, her caregiver didn't have a home of her own.
Burnt, I 99 percent agree with you but not in this case.
Caregivers who would stoop to this are like those who marry their charges for the money. They are wildly violating the trust of standard of care. My neighbors dad got hoodwinked into this and it took tons of legal for his family to extract him and put him where he could be and could afford, in this case a brookdale with a private aide on top of it.
I must disagree with you. In so many cases the only concern of the "loving" family is the elder's money. They couldn't care less about the actual person. If the caregiver takes good care of them and brings them some joy in life, then why shouldn't they marry them so they can inherit? Or why shouldn't the elder leave them their money? A family who does nothing and puts all the responsibility of the elder on their caregiver isn't more entitled to anything than the caregiver is. I don't think anyone should take advantage of an elderly person, but if someone is of sound mind they can do whatever they want with their money.
What if this elderly neighbor was leaving YOU his house? Betcha wouldn't be posting this question here on AgingCare, would you?
Elders of sound mind are legally entitled to do whatever they want to do with their assets, whether their family, friends & nosy neighbors agree with them or not.
Now, if this gentleman is suffering from Alzheimer's or another form of dementia, then he's not capable of making ANY changes to his will or signing ANY legal documents.
Lea, you and I both know that if your parents were in care and some grifter tried to get even a thousand dollar bonus from the, we’d be all over it. There are standards that caregivers need to adhere to, just like doctors, nurses, therapists and teachers.
Who told you this information -- the neighbor, or the caregiver? If the former and he's of sound mind, then there's not much to be done. If it was the caregiver, then that's a huge red flag.
How long has this person been the caregiver? Do they know about this bequest? What sort of rules do they know about in regard to accepting gifts? Did your neighbor set it up with his attorney? If so, is the attorney aware of who the beneficiary is and their relationship to your neighbor?
There are loads of questions here, and I'd talk to the neighbor, if possible, and to the V.A. They should take it from here.
One of the difficulties about late wills is that they are often made with only the recent relationships in mind. Someone who has only been on the scene for a short time, is much more in the mind of the testator than others who have done much more in the past. Old gratitude fades. It’s no wonder that family and old friends are upset when a recent blow-in gets the lot, because they are needed and present NOW. Undue influence and waning competence are often suspected, with good reason.
If your elderly neighbour is of sound mind and able to make a valid will, he can legally leave his property to whomever he pleases. So to that extent yes, it is legal.
It may not be legal for the caregiver to accept the bequest: that will depend on the terms of his/her employment contract. I know that generally caregivers are prohibited from accepting gifts (any gifts or hospitality in our case) from clients, but gifts left by will are different because they reflect a considered decision made by a competent adult and witnessed by disinterested observers.
If your neighbour really wants this person to receive the property and not get into hot water for it, he'd do well to ask his lawyer to sort out any potential problems in advance. How did you find out about it?
The VA has standards for its caregivers. This is a question that should be raised with the neighbor's VA Social Worker who can elevate it to the level required so that the VA can assess the situation.
That would be difficult though, as your neighbor may feel you're prying and becoming involved in his affairs. Alternately, I would contact the VA and work your way through the bureaucracy to find someone who is knowledgeable about restrictions governing VA paid caregivers.
You could start with the local County VA office, if there is one, or the State VA, or better yet, the regional VA hospital.
I would think this aide comes thru the local Hospital. Local office, I don't feel, would handle this.
I agree that there are children that don't deserve anything when it comes to inheritance. I agree that the gift of a house was a nice thing to give the aide that cared for someone 8 years. So it comes down to the situation.
As an aide for the VA I doubt if the aide is allowed to except such a gift. I would think any aide working for an agency is not allowed to except anything more than a small gift. You are working in a profession where its easy for a client to get attached. I feel its a conflict of interest. I also feel, that neither the client nor the aide should have said anything to the OP. None of anyones business.
This is NOT being left in a will, he is giving her the house so that she continues to take care of him. He has also given her all of his late wife's jewelry and his car. His son lives out of state and of course the man who made an offer to buy the house has been in touch with the son. I only became involved when my daughter and I came home one afternoon and found him standing naked on his balcony, unable to put a sentence together. He appeared either drugged or in the middle of a stroke, so we called the police and paramedics. It was not a stroke. We have known this man for over 20 years and of course over the years his mental capacity has diminished, whose doesn't? BUT we do not want to see him taken advantage of.
Patti, is he giving (i.e., deeding) the house to her NOW, or planning to add her name to the house title so that she inherits the house on his death?
If the former, is he aware that once she has title, she could decide not to care for him any more, evict him and leave him out on the streets?
If he was standing naked on a balcony, and you called in the authorities, are they considering or have they taken action to address his apparent need for assistance? And if so, are there any guardianship proceedings or other efforts to take control of his life in process? I can't help wondering why a neighbor hasn't contacted county or state elder care units to get help for him, especially mental help.
And the action makes me wonder how really stable he is, i.e., is he mentally stable enough to recognize that giving his house away is a very, very serious move?
I think I'd be calling local authorities for a psych exam and consideration perhaps of a court appointed guardian, or at least basic intervention for this poor fellow.
However, I'm confused by this, which seems as if he's really on the ball when it comes to selling the house:
"And how does this factor into the situation? Who is this person who wants to buy the house?
"The man who is trying to buy the condo from the elderly gentleman made an offer which the man refused becuse he said that the aide wantes $50,000 more than the previously agreed upon price. When the buyer asked her directly why she though his unit was worth $50,000 more than the unit that had sold last week, she said, "Because, you can afford it. You are an investor."
So is the aide also trying to buy the home? How did all this come to the point that he apparently now wants to give the house to the aide? And how did it occur that the "buyer" was in direct contact with the aide? It's hard to follow this.
When this buyer was looking at the unit next door, the elderly man came out of his unit and said to the buyer, "Don't buy his, buy mine." When the unit for sale was sold to a different person, the buyer the elderly man had approached went to his home and asked him if he was serious about selling him his unit. He said yes, but he didn't want to use an agent, to save the commission he wanted to sell directly. The buyer was fine with that. He offered the elderly man the exact price that the other unit had sold for. He said he would have to discuss this with his aide. The buyer agreed to wait a few days. when he went back to the elderly man to discuss the purchase, the aide was there. The elderly gentleman said that he was giving the aide the house, so it was up to her how much she wanted to sell it for. It was then that she told the buyer that she wanted $50000 more that the other unit had sold for because she knows he is an investor and can afford it. The elderly man told the buyer that he needed some time to find a place to live, so would let him know when she is ready to sell the unit. So we do not know if he has added her via quick claim, which in Florida you cannot unless it is to a blood relative. It's a very convoluted situation. He HAS signed his car over to her, months ago. He HAS given her all of his deceased wife's very extensive, valuable jewelry collection. We are NOT aware of the status of the ownership of the home present day. We DO know that he insists that SHE be included in all negotiations because in the elderly man's word, "It's her house, it's up to her." What this means we do not know.
By proceeding, I agree that I understand the following disclosures:
I. How We Work in Washington.
Based on your preferences, we provide you with information about one or more of our contracted senior living providers ("Participating Communities") and provide your Senior Living Care Information to Participating Communities. The Participating Communities may contact you directly regarding their services.
APFM does not endorse or recommend any provider. It is your sole responsibility to select the appropriate care for yourself or your loved one. We work with both you and the Participating Communities in your search. We do not permit our Advisors to have an ownership interest in Participating Communities.
II. How We Are Paid.
We do not charge you any fee – we are paid by the Participating Communities. Some Participating Communities pay us a percentage of the first month's standard rate for the rent and care services you select. We invoice these fees after the senior moves in.
III. When We Tour.
APFM tours certain Participating Communities in Washington (typically more in metropolitan areas than in rural areas.) During the 12 month period prior to December 31, 2017, we toured 86.2% of Participating Communities with capacity for 20 or more residents.
IV. No Obligation or Commitment.
You have no obligation to use or to continue to use our services. Because you pay no fee to us, you will never need to ask for a refund.
V. Complaints.
Please contact our Family Feedback Line at (866) 584-7340 or ConsumerFeedback@aplaceformom.com to report any complaint. Consumers have many avenues to address a dispute with any referral service company, including the right to file a complaint with the Attorney General's office at: Consumer Protection Division, 800 5th Avenue, Ste. 2000, Seattle, 98104 or 800-551-4636.
VI. No Waiver of Your Rights.
APFM does not (and may not) require or even ask consumers seeking senior housing or care services in Washington State to sign waivers of liability for losses of personal property or injury or to sign waivers of any rights established under law.
I agree that:
A.
I authorize A Place For Mom ("APFM") to collect certain personal and contact detail information, as well as relevant health care information about me or from me about the senior family member or relative I am assisting ("Senior Living Care Information").
B.
APFM may provide information to me electronically. My electronic signature on agreements and documents has the same effect as if I signed them in ink.
C.
APFM may send all communications to me electronically via e-mail or by access to an APFM web site.
D.
If I want a paper copy, I can print a copy of the Disclosures or download the Disclosures for my records.
E.
This E-Sign Acknowledgement and Authorization applies to these Disclosures and all future Disclosures related to APFM's services, unless I revoke my authorization. You may revoke this authorization in writing at any time (except where we have already disclosed information before receiving your revocation.) This authorization will expire after one year.
F.
You consent to APFM's reaching out to you using a phone system than can auto-dial numbers (we miss rotary phones, too!), but this consent is not required to use our service.
He may not have dementia and is still in control of his own life, finances, and decisions.
So really, he has a right to leave his property to whomever he damn well pleases. People so often think that an old person's property must all be left to their adult kids if they have them or to other family if they don't.
No, it doesn't.
A fellow caregiver and friend that I knew when we were agency help took on a case. It was for a very wealthy and elderly gay man who lived alone.
His partner who he was with for over 50 years passed away and he was alone. He had out-of-state relatives who never bothered with him. Some sent a Christmas card from time to time.
He was in poor physical health but mentally he was fine. My friend took the case and ended up quitting the agency to be a live-in caregiver for the man. She moved in with her little daughter and it worked out well for a few years until he died. He left her his entire estate. Five million cash. The property and artwork at least twice that.
He named each of his relatives by name leaving them one dollar apiece. Why shouldn't he have? My friend was the only person who was decent to him. His family couldn't be bothered.
My parents knew a caregiver who was given enough funds to buy herself a duplex so that she would be safe for life, their wish for her. The family could afford it and wished to do it. She was however, privately paid. If you are working for a hospital system there are often rules against accepting gifts.
Again, this is something for the family involved to consider and pursue if they wish to.
Caregivers who would stoop to this are like those who marry their charges for the money. They are wildly violating the trust of standard of care. My neighbors dad got hoodwinked into this and it took tons of legal for his family to extract him and put him where he could be and could afford, in this case a brookdale with a private aide on top of it.
I must disagree with you. In so many cases the only concern of the "loving" family is the elder's money.
They couldn't care less about the actual person. If the caregiver takes good care of them and brings them some joy in life, then why shouldn't they marry them so they can inherit? Or why shouldn't the elder leave them their money?
A family who does nothing and puts all the responsibility of the elder on their caregiver isn't more entitled to anything than the caregiver is.
I don't think anyone should take advantage of an elderly person, but if someone is of sound mind they can do whatever they want with their money.
Elders of sound mind are legally entitled to do whatever they want to do with their assets, whether their family, friends & nosy neighbors agree with them or not.
Now, if this gentleman is suffering from Alzheimer's or another form of dementia, then he's not capable of making ANY changes to his will or signing ANY legal documents.
Who told you this information -- the neighbor, or the caregiver? If the former and he's of sound mind, then there's not much to be done. If it was the caregiver, then that's a huge red flag.
How long has this person been the caregiver? Do they know about this bequest? What sort of rules do they know about in regard to accepting gifts? Did your neighbor set it up with his attorney? If so, is the attorney aware of who the beneficiary is and their relationship to your neighbor?
There are loads of questions here, and I'd talk to the neighbor, if possible, and to the V.A. They should take it from here.
It may not be legal for the caregiver to accept the bequest: that will depend on the terms of his/her employment contract. I know that generally caregivers are prohibited from accepting gifts (any gifts or hospitality in our case) from clients, but gifts left by will are different because they reflect a considered decision made by a competent adult and witnessed by disinterested observers.
If your neighbour really wants this person to receive the property and not get into hot water for it, he'd do well to ask his lawyer to sort out any potential problems in advance. How did you find out about it?
if OP is truly a concerned neighbour, OP would have contacted the neighbour’s family.
and if there’s no family, OP would have said from the start: “but i sort of understand why he’s giving his house away, he has no family at all.”
That would be difficult though, as your neighbor may feel you're prying and becoming involved in his affairs. Alternately, I would contact the VA and work your way through the bureaucracy to find someone who is knowledgeable about restrictions governing VA paid caregivers.
You could start with the local County VA office, if there is one, or the State VA, or better yet, the regional VA hospital.
I agree that there are children that don't deserve anything when it comes to inheritance. I agree that the gift of a house was a nice thing to give the aide that cared for someone 8 years. So it comes down to the situation.
As an aide for the VA I doubt if the aide is allowed to except such a gift. I would think any aide working for an agency is not allowed to except anything more than a small gift. You are working in a profession where its easy for a client to get attached. I feel its a conflict of interest. I also feel, that neither the client nor the aide should have said anything to the OP. None of anyones business.
We have known this man for over 20 years and of course over the years his mental capacity has diminished, whose doesn't? BUT we do not want to see him taken advantage of.
If the former, is he aware that once she has title, she could decide not to care for him any more, evict him and leave him out on the streets?
If he was standing naked on a balcony, and you called in the authorities, are they considering or have they taken action to address his apparent need for assistance? And if so, are there any guardianship proceedings or other efforts to take control of his life in process? I can't help wondering why a neighbor hasn't contacted county or state elder care units to get help for him, especially mental help.
And the action makes me wonder how really stable he is, i.e., is he mentally stable enough to recognize that giving his house away is a very, very serious move?
I think I'd be calling local authorities for a psych exam and consideration perhaps of a court appointed guardian, or at least basic intervention for this poor fellow.
However, I'm confused by this, which seems as if he's really on the ball when it comes to selling the house:
"And how does this factor into the situation? Who is this person who wants to buy the house?
"The man who is trying to buy the condo from the elderly gentleman made an offer which the man refused becuse he said that the aide wantes $50,000 more than the previously agreed upon price. When the buyer asked her directly why she though his unit was worth $50,000 more than the unit that had sold last week, she said, "Because, you can afford it. You are an investor."
So is the aide also trying to buy the home? How did all this come to the point that he apparently now wants to give the house to the aide? And how did it occur that the "buyer" was in direct contact with the aide? It's hard to follow this.
When the unit for sale was sold to a different person, the buyer the elderly man had approached went to his home and asked him if he was serious about selling him his unit. He said yes, but he didn't want to use an agent, to save the commission he wanted to sell directly. The buyer was fine with that. He offered the elderly man the exact price that the other unit had sold for. He said he would have to discuss this with his aide. The buyer agreed to wait a few days. when he went back to the elderly man to discuss the purchase, the aide was there. The elderly gentleman said that he was giving the aide the house, so it was up to her how much she wanted to sell it for. It was then that she told the buyer that she wanted $50000 more that the other unit had sold for because she knows he is an investor and can afford it. The elderly man told the buyer that he needed some time to find a place to live, so would let him know when she is ready to sell the unit. So we do not know if he has added her via quick claim, which in Florida you cannot unless it is to a blood relative. It's a very convoluted situation. He HAS signed his car over to her, months ago. He HAS given her all of his deceased wife's very extensive, valuable jewelry collection. We are NOT aware of the status of the ownership of the home present day. We DO know that he insists that SHE be included in all negotiations because in the elderly man's word, "It's her house, it's up to her." What this means we do not know.