Follow
Share

My dad is 98. His insurance is Kaiser. He has servere Aortic Stenosis and one kidney was removed due to cancer that was contained. He has had several tests to determine if he is a candidate for Transcatherer Aortic Valve Implantation including two CT scans to map is heart and arteries. The group of Cardio Doctors have determined that he should have the procedure. He keeps on asking me if he should go through with the procedure, I am on the fence I do not know what to do. First he said I'm doing it then he called me and said I do not want to do it. The reasons are he is my mother's caregiver he feels it will take him some time to recover. I am wondering if this would even help they said he would be about 20% improvement but could not guarantee. I am at a loss. I want to support him but feel it is not worth the trauma to his body to have the procedure.

Find Care & Housing
Lord have mercy your dad is 98 years old. And yes it will take a long time to recover if from nothing else but the anesthesia, as that often causes dementia type symptoms in the elderly, and all for just a possible 20% improvement??? I mean really...this is a no brainer.
If it were my dad I would ask him if it will really be worth it in the end for such a low percentage chance of even helping, as he is so very close to leaving this world anyway.
And I can't help but wonder why in the world any doctor would want to do any procedure on a 98 year old person, other than for the money, and that is a crying shame.
Let your dad just enjoy whatever time he may have left, and make sure that you have plans for your mom if he were to die first.
Helpful Answer (1)
Reply to funkygrandma59
Report

You gotta love how doctors are always so quick to blithely recommend a procedure on a really old person.

My dad s 96. I would not consent to him having a procedure like this. There is a chance your father would be okay, but I truly believe he will not recover satisfactorily, if at all.

Id want my dad to just live out his natural life without this sort of intervention.
Helpful Answer (1)
Reply to Hothouseflower
Report

My ex-MIL had this at age 93 an recovered quite quickly.

Have YOU discussed with his doctor's what the recovery looks like and what the anesthesia options are?
Helpful Answer (0)
Reply to BarbBrooklyn
Report

Kaiser isn't one to do procedures they don't think will help overmuch. I am quite surprised at 98 with a 20% chance that they wish to do this. I will tell you what I would do and that is read up on the procedure, on the recovery, and then I would ask for a meet with your Dad if you are his POA (which I assume you are at his age now).

I am also quite amazed that your Dad cares for your mother at his age?
He certainly must be unusually vital.

I am a former cardiology RN. This is a minimally invasive procedure; I am sure you know by reading up on it. However, he has a heart that is 98 years old and there's that to consider. I will say this should not be done without a Plan B that would involve both Dad and Mom in care in ALF. However, that could come any day in any case?

This is something the family should read up on, discuss, discuss with MD and ulltimately, your Dad being of sound mind, it is up to him. He knows better than anyone what he is dealing with in terms of his own longevity I do believe. It is his decision taking into consideration all the above.

Best wishes to your family. Do know that I myself would not have this procedure, but I also wouldn't have anything even minimal now, including a pacemaker. I am 82 and have little guts of old age, which your Dad is doing now so beautifully. He's a lucky guy.
Helpful Answer (1)
Reply to AlvaDeer
Report

Hopefully this is just a recommendation. The doctors have to give you all options and risks with it. Personally, I would not do it at his age. Like said the anesthesia could cause a problem. But, its Dads decision.
Helpful Answer (0)
Reply to JoAnn29
Report

Kb,
I hope you will update us here about the final choice. Do know your dad may swing back and forth a bit here. Help him to explore all the information available if he wishes to have it.
Helpful Answer (0)
Reply to AlvaDeer
Report

At 98, I dont feel that the risks are worth a 20% improvement!

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure that replaces a diseased or malfunctioning aortic valve with a new one. It's also known as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). 

Details
Purpose:
Treats aortic stenosis, a narrowing of the aortic valve that prevents blood from flowing properly to the body.

Procedure:
A catheter is inserted into a blood vessel in the chest or upper leg and used to place a new valve over the old one.

Risks:
Bleeding, abnormal heart rhythms, stroke, kidney impairment, and death.

Recovery:
Patients are monitored in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit for at least 24 hours, then moved to a regular ward for 5–10 days. Full recover normally takes 1-2 months.

TAVI is a common procedure that's mostly painless. It's often used for patients who are at high risk for surgery. 

Moderate sedation is normally used.

Since dad only has 1 kidney, I'd speak to the doctor about the risks to his remainng kidney.

Good luck with a difficult situation.
Helpful Answer (2)
Reply to lealonnie1
Report

My mother is 99, there is no way that I would go along with this, the doctors don't care, it is about money.

I am amazed that he can still take care of his wife, leave the poor guy alone.
Helpful Answer (1)
Reply to MeDolly
Report

Ask a Question
Subscribe to
Our Newsletter